Turning algae into ethanol, and gold

June 11, 2008 - Exclusive By Carli Ghelfi, Cleantech Group

Is it, in fact, a watershed in biofuels from algae?

Naples, Fla.-based Algenol Biofuels says it has found a way to inexpensively bring third-generation biofuels to industrial scale.

And, unlike most algal biofuel companies, it's apparently got a licensing deal for an $850 million project to show for it.

The company believes its seawater-based process can generate up to a billion gallons of algal ethanol per year from a facility in Mexico.

“We’re not in the biodiesel business, the lipids business or oil business,” according to CEO Paul Woods. “We believe we have the most advanced third-generation technology. Our process is completely different.”

Algenol claims to use algae, sunlight, CO2 and seawater in closed bioreactors to produce ethanol, not the biodiesel most conventional algae companies are pursuing.

Woods told Cleantech Group today that because his company does not use freshwater and does not harvest the algae, the process is much less expensive.

“You have to do it cheaply, or you have no process,” said Woods.

Woods did not specify how cheap, however.

With a reported 11 years of research and 10 years of patents under its belt, Algenol formally introduced itself and an $850 million project with Sonora Fields S.A.P.I. de C.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Mexican-owned BioFields.

The privately-funded company said it is expecting yields of 6,000 gallons per acre per year, and expects to increase that figure to 10,000 by year end.

By contrast, corn yields approximately 360 gallons per acre per year, and sugarcane 890 gallons, according to Woods.

“Basically we can take in 1.5 million tons of CO2 and convert it into 100 million gallons of ethanol,” said Woods.

“We will be the largest consumer of CO2 on the planet.”

The Algenol process occurs in bioreactors that are three-feet by fifty-feet and shaped like soda bottles, said Woods.

According to Woods, during the process, algae consumes sunlight and more than 90 percent of the system's CO2 through photosynthesis, wherein the sugars are converted into ethanol. The ethanol is immediately pumped out and evaporates into the bioreactor which is captured every night.

“This process overcomes the enormous problems other companies face,” said Woods. “We don’t use food. We don’t use feedstock. We don’t use freshwater,” emphasized Woods. “All this really helps the cost structure.”

When asked why the company, which was founded in 2006, finally decided to reveal itself, Woods said that it was keen on keeping mum while it was bringing the process to scale, which has been a difficult feat in the algal biofuel industry.

Companies like LiveFuels, GreenFuel Technologies, Aquaflow Bionomic, PetroAlgae and others have all experienced ebb and flow when it comes to announcing commercial scale production.

The only other algal biofuel company touting “scale” production is San Francisco-based Solazyme, which, coincidentally, today announced its microalgae-derived fuel has become the first algal-based biodiesel to pass the American Society for Testing and Materials D-975 specifications.

Solazyme had no comment on Algenol's development, but has experienced momentum in commercializing its fuel.

At the beginning of this year, Solazyme said it signed a biodiesel feedstock development and testing agreement with Chevron Technology Ventures (see Solazyme to work with Chevron on algae fuel).

Last summer it announced a similar deal with Seattle-based Imperium Renewables, a company which shelved its planned IPO earlier this year (see Solazyme to supply algae oil to Imperium and Imperium Renewables puts IPO on hold).

Woods said a production facility in Sonora, Mexico is expected to be online at the end of 2009, scaling to an anticipated 1 billion gallons in four-and-a-half years, involving some 3.5 million bioreactors.

The licensing agreement with Mexico's Biofields reportedly involves a deal to sell the ethanol to the Mexican government.

“We’re making a significant departure from other technologies because we’re making ethanol now, and will be selling it next year,” continued Woods.

“I think we will be supplying the cheapest fuel on the planet.”

In an effort to make waves with the U.S. government, Woods visited Washington D.C. last week to formally introduce his technology and explain how there are other ways to ethanol than just cellulosic ethanol.

Since its inception in 2006, the privately funded company has seen $70 million in investments, with zero venture capital money to its name, said Woods.

He explained that the majority of the money comes from the founders, of whom the majority has made successful exits as former CEOs from the natural gas and pharmaceutical industries.

Coverage brought to you by

Comments

Algea Alcohol Production

I find this very favorable development but the fact that it is being built in Mexico is really stupid on the US investors' and government's part. Right now I want a system I can do at home easily and relativiely safely (not in apartments or cluster housing) and give me the opportunity to at least supplement what is in my tank from OPEC and tag-alongs. Then I want a simple system I can build locally and regionally to bring the new fuels closer to the end users thereby reducing the end cost and protection from the marketing extortionist when there is a hurricane or tornado or flood near a major oil refinery. These systems have to take care of several issues at a time to get the public's approval. This will include 'garbage to fuels' (i.e. organic digesting technologies, integrated recycling, CO2 consumption zones(designated greenspaces), locations next to railway line transport systems, etc.). Get the plan right and complete. We need a very definitive energy policy and implementation plans to make it everywhere in this country facilitating removing the evil OPEC chains off our energy demanding economic engine. A true war-time footing plan and action plan. Where are these government and private sector talking heads now?

Algea to Ethanol conversion.

Keep in mind the logistics here, both big and small. 6000 gal per hectare per year works out to .055742 gal per sq.ft per year. So to fill a 20 gal tank every week for a year you will need 18,000 sq.ft of bio-reactor. That's a table 134 ft by 134 feet. A little larger than most homesteads. Then there is the problem of getting and storing and feeding the CO2 to the little critters. And that's just to replace $4200 worth of gasoline, at todays prices.

This is a land grabber project, that needs to be near a coal/oil/gas power generator. And as efficient as it is, I can't see any real ROI in less than 10 years, if at all, keeping in mind a hectare will only replace about $25,000 worth of gasoline a year.

Ethanol from Corn

And what are the comparable statistics on ethanol from corn? Table 1340 ft. x 1340 ft. or something like that?

It appears that no US

It appears that no US patents reflect Algenols claims. There are several unpublished patent applications that preempt Algenol's claims.

Does the US want Mexico controlling our transportation fuels?

Worls is wider...

I guess that what it really matters is the real posibility of ethanol mass production at low cost and high yield without affecting food production. For me and more than 90% of world inhabitants there is no sense whether the plant is on USA, Mexico or Niger.
Please, world is wider that USA...

Conversion and practical

Since the yield per acre is significantly greater than what is yielded from converting corn, it is a plus in my mind.

Corn is for eating and making good whiskey, not for pouring into my gas tank.

If as much money was spent

If as much money was spent researching the conversion of growth/cultivation of algae as is spent on corn, then one can assume the process would be well understood. The US government spends a lot of 'pork' to various universities which then abuse the funds and produce less then commendable results... perhaps the US government could invest some money in private companies with integrity.

Let's give this technology a 'fighting chance' and get the government to help out. They waste money on illegal wars... maybe they ought to invest some in our energy future.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Become a cleantech industry insider - sign up for our free newsletter