Balkin' at Bakken

April 17, 2008 by Dallas Kachan

The clean technology industry has no cause, apparently, to be rattled by reports of vast amounts of new recoverable oil in North America, threatening to undermine the economics of renewable energy.

No, the peak oil crowd—despite their, our and the rest of the world's wishes to the contrary—looks vindicated: we appear to still be running out of oil at a worrisome rate, with no magic reserves.

Two latest datapoints:

495.7 billion barrells short
New findings from the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS), released last week, suggest the oil reserves of North America's Bakken geologic formation, lying under North Dakota, Montana, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, only represent between 3.0 to 4.3 billion barrels of recoverable oil in the immediate term.

This is significant, given that estimates of the amount of oil in the Bakken formation had varied wildly, with estimates of up to 500 billion barrels touted optimistically.

The higher estimate was from a study by Leigh Price, a USGS geologist who died in 2000 before his study was formally published.

[Conspiracy theorists take note: Price's friend Tresa L. Kosnar, reached today by Cleantech.com, noted that Price, by then in his early 50s, died from a massive "unexpected and strange" coronary arrest while exercising at home. Notwithstanding that active people do sometimes die from heart attacks, Price was in great physical condition, she said, noting he spent a great deal of time riding his bike, lifting weights and running. But we digress.]

Some had worried that the possibility of 500 billion barrels of oil in Bakken would undermine clean technology investment and innovation, as it would represent approximately double what Saudi Arabia is said to have remaining.

"Peak oil? What peak?!" went the reasoning, if North America is indeed sitting on twice as much oil as the Saudis.

Bakken Formation

Unlike this one, most American maps of the Bakken Formation end at the U.S. border.
Perhaps the Canadians can get more out?

The latest USGS report only points to as much as 4.3 billion barrels accessible with today's technology. That's a far cry from 500 billion barrels, but is still a 25-fold increase over the agency's 1995 estimate of 151 million barrels, and is therefore an increase of some 6 percent in the total U.S. national recoverable oil estimates. Further oil technology innovation could potentially unlock more of the reserve, experts say, but at significant cost.

Getting at the Bakken oil is apparently expensive and difficult, and potentially as damaging to the surrounding landscape and environment as the Alberta oil sands projects, they say.

Drilling must be done down, and then horizontally, through rock, which has to be fractured with pressurized fluid and sand to release the oil tucked away in microscopic pores. So it's about as intensive to get to as the oil locked away in the sands of Alberta.

Russia now at peak production?
Another datapoint supporting the peakists: Russian officials have started to assert that oil production in Russia, after growing 58 percent in the last 10 years, is now declining.

Russian Natural Resources Minister Yuri Trutnev made an ominous admission in televised remarks after a government meeting two weeks ago:

"Now we're saying the production rate is falling this year. This is not a bogeyman, unfortunately, this is real,'' Trutnev said. Days later, Alfa Bank and Credit Suisse both also confirmed the decline.

Russia currently supplies approximately 11 percent of the world's oil.

Oil production in Mexico, Norway, The United Kingdom and the North Sea and elsewhere is already in decline, according to U.S. Department of Energy figures. Next up: Saudi Arabia?

Say what you will about the science of peak oil, or its exact timing. And no, there still isn't very good integration of the peak oil and cleantech communities; the two groups don't talk much to each other. But these latest developments underscore that it seems a safe bet to heed the peakists and continue to plan for overall oil decline as a driver of cleantech policy, innovation and adoption.

 

Dallas Kachan is one of the managing directors of the Cleantech Group, and is acting editor of its media publications, including Cleantech.com and Inside Cleantech.

Want to contribute a guest editorial to Cleantech.com? We welcome contributions, and would like to hear from you. Guidance and directions here.


Developments making news in the past 24 hours

Submitted by Pokey (not verified) on April 17, 2008 - 8:20pm.

Please review the USGS report. The USGS only used 1/3 of the Bakken Formation in their calculation which came to 3,645 MMBO (using new horizontal drilling technology). Another 1/3 they used conventional drilling assumptions (old technology) and calculated only 4 MMBO and the last 1/3 they assigned nothing because of lack of data.

They are probably assuming a conservative 3-4 percent recovery of available 100+ Billion Barrels from the 1/3 that the calculated using new technology. As this technology is refined it may show are MUCH high recovery percentage. The other 2/3 has not been estimated using the new technology.

So basically the USGS is being very conservative and there is somewhere between the 3.6 Billion and about 200 Billion recoverable

Submitted by Unregistered user (not verified) on April 18, 2008 - 3:42pm.

The USGS and EIA have a history of being wildly optimistic, perhaps, in this case, uncharacteristically realistic.

Submitted by Jim (not verified) on April 18, 2008 - 2:18am.

The only thing about your article that kind of bothers me and I see the same sentiment in other articles on this topic as well, is the notion that there is a "peak oil crowd" and that they would somehow feel vindicated, implying joyful, that yet another hydrocarbon solution to peak oil has been disproven. Speaking only for myself, the thought of the consequences of peak oil for my children disturbs me a great deal. I would like the experts to find a super giant field of light sweet crude. Of course I would also like some sanity as regards the sustainability of the planet. Rock and a hard place is a cliche that springs to mind.

Submitted by Clifford J. Wirth (not verified) on April 18, 2008 - 4:48am.

The Peak Oil catastrophe looms, around the corner, coming this year or next. Unfortunately, the development of alternative energies will dig us faster into oil depletion. For details, see: http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

Submitted by André Angelantoni (not verified) on April 18, 2008 - 1:16pm.

@pokey: the mandate of the USGS report was to assess the amount of oil recoverable using today's technologies, not possible future technologies because unless they are being rolled out now, they won't help push off peak

Also, the USGS has a demonstrable inability to project realistic oil numbers and Dave Cohen's piece at ASPO USA's site discusses why that might again be the case here.

http://www.aspo-usa.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=355&Itemid=91

Last, our immediate problem is how quickly we can get new oil to the market and because this formation is classified as "unconventional," that == not quickly. The Bakken formation will not push off peak.

It's also good to be reminded from time to time that each billion barrels of oil pushes off peak by only 6 days. We are currently using about 85 million bbl / day.

1 000 000 000 bbl / 85 000 00 bbl/day / 2
= ~6 days

So the 4 billion barrels, were it to quickly get to market (not possible, it's not conventional oil), would push off peak by approximately 24 days.

-André

Post new comment

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Become a cleantech industry insider - sign up for our free newsletter